Sebastien Sable wrote:
> I do realize that it's difficult to maintain a backend when you don't
> have a documentation and/or different scanners (indeed, i had to
> compare each scsi command between the win driver and sane's one to
> find my little bug, so it would not have been possible for someone
> without this model). And I really appreciate what you and others
> before have done to make snapscan backend work with each model.
>
> I will try to investigate the EAGAIN bug by my side and make useful
> bug reports ;)
> If you have any suggestion or want to try something, don't hesitate to
> contact me; I have quite a good knowledge of the code with all I tried
> to make it work.
We seem to have received a few useful fixes for the SnapScan backend on this
list recently. Are they making it in to CVS? Is someone needed to coordinate
these fixes into a coherent, released whole? If certainly don't mind doing that
much, even if I am reluctant to become maintainer of things I am unable to test.
Regards,
Steve
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 08 2000 - 07:00:20 PDT