Re: image data format polarity

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Thu Sep 21 2000 - 06:34:12 PDT

Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: scanimage always connects to /dev/video"

Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Additional entries for .desc files and sane-backends.html"
In reply to: Nick Lamb: "Re: image data format polarity"
Next in thread: Nick Lamb: "Re: image data format polarity"
Reply: Nick Lamb: "Re: image data format polarity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Lamb wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Wilken wrote:
> > That's not a bug, it's the PBM image format, see pbm(5):
>
> What's that got to do with anything? SANE's frame transport isn't PBM
> any more than it's TGA or BMP.
> Looks like a bug to me.
>
> Nick.
>

Where is the problem?

It had to defined and it really does not matter in which way.

Does anyone really think it would be a good idea to change an existing
standard in such a point? I don`t think so.
Where is the sense to discuss about it?

Bye
Oliver

-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: scanimage always connects to /dev/video"
Previous message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: Additional entries for .desc files and sane-backends.html"
In reply to: Nick Lamb: "Re: image data format polarity"
Next in thread: Nick Lamb: "Re: image data format polarity"
Reply: Nick Lamb: "Re: image data format polarity"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 21 2000 - 07:15:00 PDT