Re: Can a scanner be faster on Windows 98 than on Linux?

Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Sun, 17 Oct 1999 23:40:24 +0200

Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes wrote:

> Oliver Rauch wrote:
>
> > Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marcal Mendes wrote:
> >
> > > Hello
> > > I have been struggling to get my old UMax T-630 to work with sane
> > > for almost six months. I decided
> > > to start from scratch again just to see if I can find the missing
> > > point. As usual there is a very simple
> > > question that is getting in the way:
> > > Why my scanner works fine and fast with Adobe Photoshop
> > > 3.05-VistaScan 2.30 on Windows 98? When
> > > I switch to caldera 2.3-sane-1.0.1 is a completely different story: i)
> > > the scanner scans with tiny steps
> > > (so tiny that I can go for lunch and the thingy is still going) and ii)
> > > crashes with error messages at the
> > > end of the whole scanning process (that is, no image). What is going on?
> > >
> > > Thanks for your help.
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> >
> > Hi Ed,
> >
> > please try the new umax driver from my homepage!
>
> Hi Oliver
> Greetings.
> What do you mean? The new xsane-0.39?

No, not xsane, sane-umax!

Bye
Oliver

--
EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com