Re: Silly noises instead of an Image

aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis (artsci@freemail.gr)
Wed, 30 Dec 1998 14:32:49 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Silly noises instead of an Image"
Previous message: Bernd Schroeder: "New version of microtek2 backend - testers wanted"
Maybe in reply to: aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis: "Silly noises instead of an Image"
Next in thread: Nicolas de Peslouan: "Re: Silly noises instead of an Image"

a.bolsch@ic.ac.uk wrote:
> --speed and --backtrack has no meaning for the SE. Get rid of this damn
> crippled SCSI-card shipped with the scanner. I've got an Adaptec 1520 and
> 486-machine, a full page scan at 300dpi takes just 3 min. And kill anything
> not absolutely necessary before scanning.

I think that this isn't a solution!
Or I could say: Change the OS and buy M$ in order to have whatever you want
to!
I think that some people have used both the scanner and the scsi interface
card I'm using and they have used it right! What did they do? Is it so
difficult to describe??????

-- Nikolas Diamandis mailto:artsci@freemail.gr

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Hugo van der Kooij: "Re: Silly noises instead of an Image"
Previous message: Bernd Schroeder: "New version of microtek2 backend - testers wanted"
Maybe in reply to: aRtsCi - Nikos Diamandis: "Silly noises instead of an Image"
Next in thread: Nicolas de Peslouan: "Re: Silly noises instead of an Image"