Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage

charter@cs.ualberta.ca
Wed, 13 May 1998 23:56:47 -0600 (MDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
Previous message: Matto Marjanovic: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
In reply to: Daniel Stephens: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"
Next in thread: Warren Early: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"

>
> > I don't know how others feel about this, but in my opinion it is best
> > to default to scan the _entire_ scan surface by default. The
> > experiences with the Microtek and SnapScan backend seem to indicate
> > that anything else simply confuses the (naive) user.
>
> I would be inclined to throw in my $0.02 and stand behind David's opinion,
> by default it should scan what can be scanned.. Ideally the user interface to
> the scanner software should make it very straightforward to crop the
> scanning area if so desired.

OK, I'm agreed. As soon as I get a chance I'll change the default scan area.

Kevin

-- Kevin Charter /\ Grad Studies charter@cs.ualberta.ca /\/ \ Department of Computing Science http://web.cs.ualberta.ca/~charter \ -------- University of Alberta -------------- Edmonton AB CANADA

--
Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: David Mosberger-Tang: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
Previous message: Matto Marjanovic: "Re: sane 0.73 pre-test patch"
In reply to: Daniel Stephens: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"
Next in thread: Warren Early: "Re: problems with snapscan and scanimage"