Re: Is my Artec AT12 broken?

From: Henning Meier-Geinitz (
Date: Sun Jun 17 2001 - 08:28:48 PDT

  • Next message: Douglas Gilbert: "Re: Kernel 2.4.X and HP Scanjet 6300C"


    On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:32:31PM +0100, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
    > decent scan (at least at up to 300 DPI). Did the sane network protocol
    > change incompatibly between versions 1.0.1 and 1.0.4?

    As far as I know: No. If a change is necessary, there is a check for
    earlier versions of the protocoll.

    > Or are there known bugs with network scanning prior to version 1.0.4?

    Yes (and even including 1.0.4). But these are usually memory
    violations and memory leaks that may result in segmentation faults. I
    don't think they can result in a slowdown of transfer.


    Source code, list archive, and docs:
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2001 - 20:48:53 PDT