> > You cannot assume that the first device is usbscanner0. While a device is
> > plugged in, it's device node doesn't change. Note: You can't tell easily
> > whether it was replugged.
> I may be wrong but all this doesn't look like scanner.o had more then
> one scanner in mind. Looks pretty weird.
It's hard to find an alternative. A system based on physical location in the
tree would quickly exhaust all available device node space.
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 07 2001 - 21:48:09 PST