Bob Washburne wrote:
> The store where I purchased the HP 5370C also sells the 6300C. This
> appears to be better supported (supports SCL under the HP backend and I
> have a SCSI I/F for it). But is it pulling the same marketing crap of
> claiming 36 bpp while only delivering 24? I only mention HP because I
> can get them locally. If there is a better scanner out there I wouldn't
> mind getting it mail order.
I have a 6350 and can confirm that it will scan at 1200dpi optical
resolution. Any resolution thereafter will be handled in software. If
I do a 1200dpi color scan uncropped, the resulting image saved in
xscanimage is *huge*, roughly 800MB or so.
I just fired up xscanimage and noticed that the "bit depth" option in
"Advanced Properties" only contains "8, 10, and 12" for the selection?
From the box:
1200 dpi optical resolution
1200x2400 dpi hardware resolution
I'm not an expert on some of this marketing spin, so make of this what
you will. The resolution seems a no-brainer, but the bit depth may need
further investivation. FWIW, for the price of this scanner, you
*should* get true 36-bit color, but I don't know for sure. Sorry.
Jeffrey H. Ingber (email@example.com)
> Thanks very much for your help.
> Bob Washburne
> Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
> To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail firstname.lastname@example.org
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 19:58:11 PST