is lalloca.h installed on any system? [was:#include <sane...> instead of "sane..."]

From: Oliver Rauch (oliver.rauch@Wolfsburg.DE)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:41:43 PST

  • Next message: Oliver Rauch: "Re: #include <sane...> instead of "sane...""

    Jochen Eisinger wrote:
    >
    > Hi!
    >
    > [Oliver Rauch]
    > > In the manpage of getopt it is described that
    > > #include <getopt.h> should be done. So it has
    > > to be used or we get problems when getopt is
    > > available at the system.
    > >
    > > With lalloca.h I don`t know but I don`t see
    > > a problem here to keep it as it is.
    >
    > The problem I saw was that some backends #include "lalloca.h" and some
    > use <lalloca.h>
    >
    >

    Hi,

    does anyone know if lalloca.h is installed on any system?
    if not, we should use "lalloca.h" or "../include/lalloca.h"
    otherwise we should use <lalloca.h>

    Bye
    Oliver

    -
    Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
    sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html
    xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html
    E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE

    --
    Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/
    To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 04 2000 - 23:54:48 PST