Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Oliver Rauch]
> > it looks like ld (=ld-linux?) is already linked to libsane-dll,
>
> the dynamic linker is not the same as -ldl. (On my installation
> libsane-dll.so is linked with libdl, and things should work as
> expected.)
>
> > I think that if the required libs are linked to the sane backends it
> > should be enough if a frontend links against libsane.
>
> I believe you are right. Is this the case?
>
> > So if a backend needs a jpeg library, the library has to be linked
> > to the backend lib not to the frontend.
>
> Yes, but is this the case at the moment? Is there an easy way to
> implement this. At the moment, I believe all backends are linked with
> the same libraries. The makefiles and configure scripts need to be
> fixed to have it any other way.
>
All I tested worked fine when I compiled xsane/xscanimage with
-lsane
instead of the options listed by sane-config.
May be we should test it in the sane cvs:
make sane-config --libs say "-lsane"
and test it with the sane-frontend package.
(The package is prepeared, where shall I upload it?)
If it does work - good,
if not: we do not change sane-config for sane-1.0.4
Bye
Oliver
-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 09:07:34 PST