Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file...

From: Petter Reinholdtsen (pere@hungry.com)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 20:12:35 PDT

Next message: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"

Previous message: Jeff Martin: "Epson 610 not Microtek Scanmaker 3700 USB"
Maybe in reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
Next in thread: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
Reply: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[Jochen Eisinger]
> What about just checking the backend name against "dll" while
> reading the dll.conf? This avoids that dll segfaults if dll is
> listed in the dll.conf.

Why do dll segfault? Shouldn't this be fixed first?

I have not tested the patch, but it looks OK to me. I only suspect it
might be the wrong fix. :-)

-- ##> Petter Reinholdtsen <## | pere@td.org.uit.no

-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com

Next message: Petter Reinholdtsen: "Re: sane fronten packages"
Previous message: Jeff Martin: "Epson 610 not Microtek Scanmaker 3700 USB"
Maybe in reply to: Jochen Eisinger: "make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
Next in thread: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
Reply: Jochen Eisinger: "Re: make dll.c robust against it being listed in its configuration file..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 19 2000 - 20:02:27 PDT