Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > In the most cases a user needs only one of xscanimage/xsane,
> > so it does not make sense to create a package that includes both
> > xcam is only interesting for cameras or may be the bttv backend.
> > So most users do not need it.
> So make a package with xcam, xscanimage and the Java backend?
Yes, I suggest to create 2-3 packages: xcam, xscanimage and may be the
Java backend (is that still supported, does it work?)
I think it should be possible to create a build environment from the
xsane package. I don`t know if I will find the time to do that.
Is someone interested in working on that?
-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:25:21 PDT