On Fri, 06 Oct 2000, you wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:51:08AM -0400, Peck Dickens wrote:
> > ImageMagick is the best even though it does not have a graphical front end.
>
> Actually it does. Type "display". It's just a totally different kind of
> tool from Gimp, and one better suited to the task of making small black
> and white PNMs than Gimp is or likely wants to be. Thanks for mentioning it.
I like ImageMagick more than any of the other graphic manipulation packages
available. Display is a unique command (For that matter, a lot of what is in
imageMagick is unique). Further, you are right, display provides a GUI... I
Forgot about that. The only time I use display is to create visual directories
of images. All of the other things I do with ImageMagic are driven by scripts I
have written through the years.
Also, I've got a distributed environment that I use to process thousands of images
that utilizes ImageMagick. I've recently been looking into the feasibility to a
small beowulf cluster as an upgrade to the distributed environment I've had for
years. That would be hoot: process a couple of thousand images in under 30
seconds....
--Best
Peck
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 07 2000 - 14:55:04 PDT