Yuri Dario wrote:
> >wait until data is available.
> >If this works like I expect we do not need any fork or thread.
> that's will be nice: fork() is not the best solution for OS/2, and my
> threads implementation is not perfect.
at least at unix a fork is more compatible than a thread.
But I think in the moment the fork is used very stupid.
We will be most compatible to all systems if we do not use anything like that.
When I find the time I will play around a bit with a reader routine
without a fork and a second or a larger buffer. But that will not
come for sane-1.0.2 ;-)
-- Homepage: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch sane-umax: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-umax.html xsane: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html E-Mail: mailto:Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Feb 20 2000 - 15:12:33 PST