> Could anyone point out to me what the result of the 16 bit per pixel
> discussion was? I find the discussion in my mail archive but not the
> conclusion ;-) Did you agree on a possibility for the frontend to find
> out about the original bit depth?
> It seems to me that all backends available today have problems with 16
> bit gray images as they report that this was not a supported depth. I
> looked into some of the sources and it seems that 16 bit is treated as
> "unknown" at least in scanimage and xsane(0.39). Any idea for a quick
> fix (for the software or my brain) ;-) ?
xsane should work with color and grayscale images with 16 bits/pixel.
-- EMAIL: Oliver.Rauch@Wolfsburg.DE WWW: http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail firstname.lastname@example.org