Re: Not to look a gift horse in the mouth...
Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:40:31 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Timothy Reaves wrote:

> ...but could someone explain to me why on my HP 3C, 300 dpi scans come
> out much worse under xsanimage or xsane then they do with the software
> that came with my scanner under Windows NT?

Hmm. Could you define 'worse'? And are you 1000% convinced both systems
use the same resolution? Both optic and logical?


Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ  Maasland
Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial)
    email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!

Source code, list archive, and docs:
To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail