> On the configure for both Sanes I get a GTK warning -- 1.0.4 but GTK+
> 0.0.0 found. That's clearly erroneous as I doubt a version 0.0.0 ever
> existed ;-)
I'm still having trouble here, despite the appropriate library reported by
ldconfig. This does account for the failure to build xscanimage, though.
> dest = (ppm_dest_ptr)
> (*cinfo->mem->alloc_small) ((j_common_ptr) cinfo, JPOOL_IMAGE,
^
Looks to me like this star should not be there. Am I wrong? There are
some other similar lines, (though they don't fail??). I've changed them
all and it still compiles ok, so there are now no bugs, right? <grin>
> Attempting to run scanimage, I get:
> # scanimage --device /dev/scanner > /tmp/try.pnm
> scanimage: open of device /dev/scanner failed: Invalid argument
>
> /dev/scanner is symbolically linked to /dev/sgg, which is where my
... and tools/find-scanner finds it ok at both locations
(AGFA SNAPSCAN 600 1.20).
So ... devices aren't '/dev's, huh? -- Ho Hum.
Setting to -d snapscan or -d snapscan:/dev/scanner with full
debugging proceeds ok, but still give the same error.
Setting to -d snapscan:/dev/sgg may give a clue -- it appears to try
and use /dev/sga and the source code says it only supports /dev/sga --
though I'm not convinced that's true. I haven't yet found out where it
gets that sga -- it's not from the .conf files.
TIA,
G.
-- Gordon Scott gordon@apis.demon.co.uk gordon@multitone.co.uk (work) <A HREF="http://www.apis.demon.co.uk">Gordon's Apis Home Page</A> Beekeeper; Kendo 3rd Dan, retd :-(; Sometime sailor. Hampshire, England. Linux -- Because I like to *get* there today.
-- Source code, list archive, and docs: http://www.mostang.com/sane/ To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe sane-devel | mail majordomo@mostang.com